首页> 外文OA文献 >Predicting and Preventing The Theft Of Electronic Products
【2h】

Predicting and Preventing The Theft Of Electronic Products

机译:预测和防止电子产品被盗

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The research presented within this paper was conducted as part of a two-year project (Project MARC) to develop and render operational a mechanism to assess the risk of theft of electronic products. Clarke and Newman (2002) proposed the use of two checklists – one to measure vulnerability the other to measure security, as a means of categorising products according to their vulnerability to theft. Consultation with key stakeholders yielded the common view that such a mechanism was worth pursuing, but that it must reflect the language of those who would use it. An extensive consultation with stakeholders from ten European member states ensued. Participants were asked to rate a range of electronic products in terms of vulnerability and security and to explain their ratings. Their responses were used to develop two checklists which incorporate a variety of factors, weighted according to the frequency with which they were expressed. The crime vulnerability checklist developed within this paper is judged fit for purpose as a provisional measurement but urge caution in relation to the security checklist.
机译:本文中提出的研究是作为一个为期两年的项目(MARC项目)的一部分进行的,目的是开发并实施一种评估电子产品被盗风险的机制。 Clarke和Newman(2002)提出使用两个清单–一个用于衡量漏洞的清单,另一个用于衡量安全性的清单,作为根据产品的被盗程度对产品进行分类的一种方法。与主要利益相关者的协商产生了一种普遍的观点,即这种机制值得追求,但是它必须反映使用该机制的人的语言。随后,与来自十个欧洲成员国的利益相关者进行了广泛的磋商。要求参与者根据脆弱性和安全性对一系列电子产品进行评级,并解释其评级。他们的回答被用来制定两个清单,其中包括各种因素,并根据表达它们的频率进行加权。本文中开发的犯罪脆弱性检查表被认为适合作为临时度量,但在安全检查表方面应谨慎行事。

著录项

  • 作者

    Armitage, Rachel; Pease, Ken;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号